I see that there is already a PR to fix the modules hyperlink.

Should this be applied and the ASF Pelican version of httpd.apache.org be put 
into production in 24 hours?

HTH,
Dave

> On Jun 29, 2021, at 2:23 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi -
> 
>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Dave,
>> 
>> Thanks for having done it.
>> 
>> You did faster and better than what I had started.
>> 
>> 
>> Here are a few details spotted here and there:
>>   - The download page looks broken
>>     (https://httpd.staged.apache.org/download.cgi)
> 
> This is due to the staging environment not picking up the production pickup 
> of cgi to mirror mapping into the download.html template.
> 
>> 
>>   - some '&' have been turned into &amp;
>>     (https://httpd.staged.apache.org/dev/debugging.htmll#gcore)
> 
> Fixed by switching from ``` fenced code to <pre>
> 
>> 
>>   - some extra spaces in a command (around the use of awk)
>> (https://httpd.staged.apache.org/dev/release.html#how-to-do-a-release)
> 
> Removed. BTW - this page and associated scripts need to be edited to reflect 
> the website being git based.
> 
>> 
>>   - a bold string left with **
>>     (https://httpd.staged.apache.org/dev/styleguide.html)
> 
> Good catch Github Flavored Markdown (GFM) does not like spaces for emphasis. 
> If you want to do bold italic: it’s ‘**_word_**'
> 
>> 
>>   - a link that is left as [foo](bar) instead of an hypertext link
>>     (at the very bottom of https://httpd.staged.apache.org/contributors/)
> 
> Also GFM does not do any markdown within HTML blocks. I switched from <H3> to 
> ### heading.
> 
>> 
>> Only the first point is an issue. It is maybe linked to the fact that it is 
>> in staging?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> 
>> I guess that all the other tiny things could be fixed easily but don't have 
>> time to look at it by myself in the coming days/weeks.
>> 
>> 
>> I don't know if you hand modified a few things, but several places looks 
>> better now (some spacing between paragraphs which are smaller now, some 
>> alignment, some missing spaces between words that have been fixed, some 
>> numbering that were broken and fixed now, some links that have been added 
>> for URL or mails). So, great work!
> 
> There were a few tweaks to obviously broken content. URLs and emails are 
> automatically turned to hyperlinks by GFM.
> 
>> Thanks a lot.
> 
> You’re welcome.
> 
> Dave
> 
>> 
>> CJ
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le 25/06/2021 à 19:12, Dave Fisher a écrit :
>>> The Migration from CMS to ASF-Pelican is staged!
>>> 
>>> https://httpd.staged.apache.org/ is ready.
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/httpd-site/
>>> 
>>> See the README on GitHub for details.
>>> 
>>> All The Best,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 22, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 21, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 3:25 PM Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, Eric:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes, committers can use either GitHub or Gitbox.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am not sure what the "can you give a hint about the migration aspect" 
>>>>>> means. Maybe I was not clear. We have to move all projects off the 
>>>>>> Apache CMS and to some other technology, such as Pelican. Infra can help 
>>>>>> with that move to a Git repository. Sometime this summer the Apache CMS 
>>>>>> will stop functioning, which would mean you would have a hard time 
>>>>>> updating your website.
>>>>> I was referring to  "...migration process available that could speed
>>>>> things along." not the overall migration off the CMS.
>>>>> Daniel referred to
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features
>>>>> but I didn't find any reference to "migration".
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/httpd-site was created but it's empty.  I
>>>>> was assuming we'd have some starting point based on the CMS-based site
>>>>> content and whatever additional template/scaffolding is needed that
>>>>> we'd be able to see w/o replacing our currently published site.
>>>>> I don't want anyone to start from scratch if there's a better way to
>>>>> get started.
>>>> I have the go ahead to do the migration for you. The goal is to create a 
>>>> staged site that will be nearly identical to your current site.
>>>> 
>>>> Expect more information this week.
>>>> 
>>>> All The Best,
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>> 
> 

Reply via email to