> Am 06.09.2021 um 10:42 schrieb Marion et Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Message du 06/09/21 09:42
>> De : ic...@apache.org
>> A : c...@httpd.apache.org
>> Copie à :
>> Objet : *** SPAM *** svn commit: r1892963 -
>> /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>>
>> Author: icing
>> Date: Mon Sep 6 07:42:34 2021
>> New Revision: 1892963
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1892963&view=rev
>> Log:
>> assuming Christophe is for the backport he proposed. [skip ci]
>
> Wrong assumption. :)
>
> I sometimes propose for backport things that I don't vote for.
> This happens when it really looks like a good candidate, but I don't have the
> knowledge to have my own opinion on it.
> All I could do is to run the test framework, but travis already does it for
> us.
Sorry about this! I live and learn! At least try to...
> So, you don't have my +1 for this one :(
> (but I'm sure Yann or anyone else will add his +1)
>
> CJ
>
>>
>> Modified:
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1892963&r1=1892962&r2=1892963&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Mon Sep 6 07:42:34 2021
>> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>> *) mpm_prefork: mask signals during ap_run_child_init()
>> trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1890465
>> 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1890465 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk .
>> - +1:
>> + +1: jailletc36,
>>
>> PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED
>> [ New entries should be added at the START of the list ]
>>
>>
>>
