On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:16 PM Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 9/6/21 11:38 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > Index: modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (revision 1892971)
> > +++ modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (working copy)
> > @@ -2268,33 +2268,45 @@ static int ap_proxy_retry_worker(const char *proxy
> > * were passed a UDS url (eg: from mod_proxy) and adjust uds_path
> > * as required.
> > */
> > -static void fix_uds_filename(request_rec *r, char **url)
> > +static int fix_uds_filename(request_rec *r, char **url)
> > {
> > - char *ptr, *ptr2;
> > - if (!r || !r->filename) return;
> > + char *uds_url = r->filename + 6, *origin_url;
> >
> > - if (!strncmp(r->filename, "proxy:", 6) &&
> > - !ap_cstr_casecmpn(r->filename + 6, "unix:", 5) &&
> > - (ptr2 = r->filename + 6 + 5, ptr = ap_strchr(ptr2, '|'))) {
> > + if (!ap_cstr_casecmpn(r->filename, "proxy:", 6) &&
> > + !ap_cstr_casecmpn(uds_url, "unix:", 5) &&
>
> Why doing case insensitive checks here? Shouldn't we insist on case here and
> use strncmp ?
Yes, correct, spurious change.
>
> > + (origin_url = ap_strchr(uds_url + 5, '|'))) {
> > + char *uds_path = NULL;
> > + apr_size_t url_len;
> > apr_uri_t urisock;
> > apr_status_t rv;
> > - *ptr = '\0';
> > - rv = apr_uri_parse(r->pool, ptr2, &urisock);
> > - if (rv == APR_SUCCESS) {
> > - char *rurl = ptr+1;
> > - char *sockpath = ap_runtime_dir_relative(r->pool,
> > urisock.path);
> > - apr_table_setn(r->notes, "uds_path", sockpath);
> > - *url = apr_pstrdup(r->pool, rurl); /* so we get the scheme for
> > the uds */
> > - /* r->filename starts w/ "proxy:", so add after that */
> > - memmove(r->filename+6, rurl, strlen(rurl)+1);
> > +
> > + *origin_url = '\0';
> > + rv = apr_uri_parse(r->pool, uds_url, &urisock);
> > + *origin_url++ = '|';
> > +
> > + if (rv == APR_SUCCESS && urisock.path && !urisock.hostname) {
> > + uds_path = ap_runtime_dir_relative(r->pool, urisock.path);
> > + }
> > + if (!uds_path) {
> > + ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r, APLOGNO()
> > + "Invalid proxy UDS filename (%s)",
> > + r->filename);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + {
> > + apr_table_setn(r->notes, "uds_path", uds_path);
> > +
> > + /* Remove the UDS path from *url and r->filename */
> > + url_len = strlen(origin_url);
> > + *url = apr_pstrmemdup(r->pool, origin_url, url_len);
> > + memcpy(uds_url, *url, url_len + 1);
>
> With a short uds path and a long origin_url couldn't this be overlapping?
> I think memcpy is unsafe with overlapping memory and we should stay with
> memmove.
*url is newly allocated here, so there is no possible overlap with the
initial r->filename.
Regards;
Yann.
