On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 8:52 PM Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 9/22/21 8:31 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > > > On 9/21/21 9:56 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> I am just investigating a case where a httpd 2.4.49 gets stuck and as part > >> of the investigation > >> I am asking myself if we should count processes that die because of > >> MaxRequestsPerChild still count > >> to active_daemons? > >> Because if we do like today we may prevent replacement processes to be > >> started while the other processes die, e.g. if > >> active_daemons hits active_daemons_limit. > > > > Answering to my own question: > > > > We do decrement active_daemons if we shutdown a process because we have too > > much idle threads, but we don't do it if the child > > process decides on its own to die because of MaxRequestsPerChild. The below > > patch shoudl fix this. Opinions? > > > r1893520 / PR65592
Nice, thanks RĂ¼diger. Regards; Yann.