On 16 Jan 2022, at 18:54, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe "ldap_escape" would be a more appropriate name, should there be > a need for another ldap function (e.g. "ldap_unescape") later?
This doesn’t follow the existing “short” naming pattern of the existing entries. I image that we’d add something like “unldap" to match “unbase64”. Regards, Graham —
