On 7/21/22 1:21 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Thu Jul 21 11:21:30 2022
> New Revision: 1902909
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1902909&view=rev
> Log:
> core: Follow up to r1902728 and r1902906: simplify for APR-1.8+.
> 
> apr_threadattr_max_free_set() is now in APR-1.8.x.
> 
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util.c
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util.c
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util.c?rev=1902909&r1=1902908&r2=1902909&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util.c (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util.c Thu Jul 21 11:21:30 2022

> @@ -3355,19 +3355,6 @@ AP_DECLARE(apr_status_t) ap_thread_main_
>          return rv;
>      }
>  
> -#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,8,0) && !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0)
> -    /* Don't let the thread's pool allocator with no limits, though there
> -     * is possibly no allocator with APR <= 1.7 and APR_POOL_DEBUG.
> -     */
> -    {
> -        apr_pool_t *tp = apr_thread_pool_get(*thread);
> -        apr_allocator_t *ta = apr_pool_allocator_get(tp);
> -        if (ta) {
> -            apr_allocator_max_free_set(ta, ap_max_mem_free);
> -        }
> -    }
> -#endif
> -

Why don't we do the above for APR <= 1.7? The code is now NULL safe for 
APR_POOL_DEBUG.

>      apr_pool_cleanup_register(pool, *thread, main_thread_cleanup,
>                                apr_pool_cleanup_null);
>      return APR_SUCCESS;
> @@ -3398,12 +3385,12 @@ AP_DECLARE(apr_status_t) ap_thread_curre
>              abort_fn(rv);
>          return rv;
>      }
> +    apr_allocator_max_free_set(ta, ap_max_mem_free);
>      rv = apr_pool_create_unmanaged_ex(&p, abort_fn, ta);
>      if (rv != APR_SUCCESS) {
>          return rv;
>      }
>      /* Don't let the thread's pool allocator with no limits */

The comment should move as well.

> -    apr_allocator_max_free_set(ta, ap_max_mem_free);
>      apr_allocator_owner_set(ta, p);
>  
>      osthd = apr_os_thread_current();
> 
> 
> 

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to