> Am 16.10.2023 um 12:28 schrieb Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>:
>
> First of all thanks for RM.
> It looks to me that we have 2 accepted backports in the STATUS that have not
> been merged.
> This seems unfortunate.
Well, I asked people to bring in the changes they want. I am not a merge
machine for everyone. ^^
If someone wants to add them, I'll make an rc2 with it.
Cheers,
Stefan
>
> Regards
>
> RĂ¼diger
>
> On 10/16/23 12:07 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc1 as 2.4.58:
>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>
>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>> sha256: 1e381c8aa2d02d323837db042109b2286370fbf20e75d3b292e31f2519599e5b
>> *httpd-2.4.58-rc1.tar.gz
>> sha512:
>> dd867519c9c9317365f823c4b532fc5491536df5b4ea1ec5870571106efea89a3b81d385578c7d007f935f91b52c55c0830e2d49edcaa32478601b1c2ae6c557
>> *httpd-2.4.58-rc1.tar.gz
>>
>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc1-candidate.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Stefan
>>
>> *) the -deps.* archives are added only for convenience and not part of the
>> release
>>