> Am 17.10.2023 um 20:37 schrieb SteffenAL <i...@apachelounge.com>:
> 
> Found it. 
> 
> My error, had included  h2_ws.h as extra library (sorry!).
> 
> Vote now is +1

Thanks, Steffen. Good that you found the mistake.

> 
> Steffen
> 
>> --- Original message --- 
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58 
>> From: Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> 
>> To: <dev@httpd.apache.org> 
>> Date: Tuesday, 17/10/2023 18:29
>> 
>> For me still -1. 
>> 
>>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 18:18 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev <dev@httpd.apache.org> 
>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>> 
>>> Just got a reply from a contact that build rc3 on win64 and ran it 
>>> successfully. I invited him to participate here, not sure if he will feel 
>>> like it.
>>> 
>>> I count that as a +1 on win64 unless someone objects.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Stefan
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 12:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev 
>>>> <dev@httpd.apache.org>:
>>>> 
>>>> I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on 
>>>> Windows.
>>>> 
>>>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Same error on win64.
>>>>> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64.
>>>>> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I 
>>>>> am not a developer, just building and testing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards, Steffen
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev 
>>>>>> <dev@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com>:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -1 does not build on windows.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is
>>>>>> - you can build on win64
>>>>>> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build
>>>>>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Correct?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Steffen
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev 
>>>>>>>>> <dev@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>>>>>>>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58:
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
>>>>>>>> sha256: 
>>>>>>>> 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 
>>>>>>>> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> sha512: 
>>>>>>>> 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3
>>>>>>>>  *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 
> <1pixel.gif>

Reply via email to