On 4/3/24 3:55 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Apr 3 13:55:56 2024
> New Revision: 1916784
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1916784&view=rev
> Log:
> amend log message
>
> Modified:
> httpd/dev-tools/release/README
>
> Modified: httpd/dev-tools/release/README
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/dev-tools/release/README?rev=1916784&r1=1916783&r2=1916784&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/dev-tools/release/README (original)
> +++ httpd/dev-tools/release/README Wed Apr 3 13:55:56 2024
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ Usage overview:
> If CHANGES is really bad, consider replacing the various CHANGES files
> on dist/httpd.
> # If you are a moderator for announce@httpd.a.o or announce@a.o moderate
> your own announcement
> at https://webmod.apache.org/?action=frontpage
> + # Edit the CVE info into the revisions that fixed them in the backport,
> e.g. `svn propedit --revprop -r... svn:log`
Someone opposed if we add a step that asks to add the revision numbers of the
backport to the specific CVE timeline?
Regards
RĂ¼diger