On 4/3/24 3:55 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Apr  3 13:55:56 2024
> New Revision: 1916784
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1916784&view=rev
> Log:
> amend log message
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/dev-tools/release/README
> 
> Modified: httpd/dev-tools/release/README
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/dev-tools/release/README?rev=1916784&r1=1916783&r2=1916784&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/dev-tools/release/README (original)
> +++ httpd/dev-tools/release/README Wed Apr  3 13:55:56 2024
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ Usage overview:
>       If CHANGES is really bad, consider replacing the various CHANGES files 
> on dist/httpd.
>     # If you are a moderator for announce@httpd.a.o or announce@a.o moderate 
> your own announcement
>       at https://webmod.apache.org/?action=frontpage
> +   # Edit the CVE info into the revisions that fixed them in the backport, 
> e.g. `svn propedit --revprop -r... svn:log`

Someone opposed if we add a step that asks to add the revision numbers of the 
backport to the specific CVE timeline?

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to