On 9/11/24 5:59 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 12:20 PM Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Looks like there is no further feedback on the below. >> @Yann: Care to commit https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39832 >> ? >> I would then commit my stuff below. > > Done (r1920570). > > I suppose we need a single backport proposal for both PRs 69235 and 69260? I marked 69260 as a duplicate of 69235, but still mentioned it in the changelog for the sake of referencing the discussion on both PR's. > If so maybe amend "changes-entries/pr69235.txt" with your follow up commit? Done in r1920572. Backport would be 1920570, 1920571, 1920572 then. Regards Rüdiger
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend with existing ... Eric Covener
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend with exis... Eric Covener
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend with exis... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend with ... Eric Covener
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend w... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend w... Eric Covener
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend w... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend w... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend w... Yann Ylavic
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend w... Yann Ylavic
- Re: [Bug 69235] unable to connect to backend w... Ruediger Pluem