On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 07:00:17AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote: > Sorry for the confusion, I struggled with the wording. It is the more > conservative interpretation. The other way to phrase it: the CI is > the "third" approval. > > In a typical case where you propose in STATUS and include your own +1, > we required two additional committers to sign off. > In the case where you submit a PR and CI passes / is explainable, the > positive vote here says we only require 1 additional committer. > > I think we can keep existing votes if we are choosing the more > conservative interpretation.
This is how I read it too, FWIW. Regards, Joe
