Nishith, are you working on the site? Just wanted to confirm and see if you
need more help from one of us.

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:21 PM Vinoth Chandar <
mail.vinoth.chan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What thomas says, makes sense to me. For now, we can just import site into
> asf-site and make a call on what we check into master down the line?
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:17 PM Vinoth Chandar <
> mail.vinoth.chan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Guess it does nt clutter source code with docs, js, css etc?
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:46 PM nishith agarwal <n3.nas...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I vote for #3 as well. Yes, I'll take up the lead on this.
>>> BTW, why is creating a separate branch (asf-site) so popular ? I see that
>>> many projects have done that.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nishith
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 2:13 PM Anbu Cheeralan <anc...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I prefer #3 that will keep the documentation in-sync with the code.
>>> >
>>> > On 2019/01/24 21:27:39, Vinoth Chandar <mail.vinoth.chan...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > Hello all,
>>> > >
>>> > > Just summarizing how the current project documentation is setup and
>>> then
>>> > > use this thread to discuss how we want to proceed. Its based on
>>> Jekyll
>>> > and
>>> > > markup.To build Hudi docs, you just need to install gem/ruby set and
>>> spin
>>> > > up Jekyll.
>>> > > https://idratherbewriting.com/documentation-theme-jekyll/  has
>>> > > instructions.
>>> > >
>>> > > We have a few options to manage docs.
>>> > >
>>> > > 1. Separate repo (away from source code)
>>> > > 2. Special branch along with code (asf-site branch here
>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi )
>>> > > 3. Checked into a top level docs folder on all branches (current
>>> > approach)
>>> > >
>>> > > I vote for #3. I have do #2 on a previous open source project and the
>>> > code
>>> > > kept diverging from docs.
>>> > >
>>> > > What do you all think?
>>> > >
>>> > > Nishith, can you confirm you are taking the lead on this?
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > Vinoth
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to