Hi Balaji, I never had this issue with 0.4.5 version of the release. The only release I got this issue was with 0.4.6-SNAPSHOT about 3 to 5 weeks ago. I resorted to manually making the changes in my local to get through some testing done. I am a bit confused as to how CDH5.7 is working with 0.4.6 as there are no hive version changes. I shall take the latest 0.4.6 release and can retest and then come back to you with my findings. It shouldnt take much time. I shall circle around in 2 days. Thanks Kabeer.
On May 19 2019, at 8:43 pm, [email protected] wrote: > + 1 on deprecating Hive 1.1. > On the other note mentioned by Kabeer, > Hey Kabeer, > The Hive integration with CDH 5.7.x still works fine. We internally use the > hive-sync capability of latest version of Hudi to let deltastreamer sync to > Hive 1.x tables. We do not have CH 5.13 setup. Did you notice that older > version of Hudi (pre-0.4.6) worked fine with CDH 5.13 ? > Balaji.V > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, May 19, 2019, 11:45:24 AM PDT, Kabeer Ahmed <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi, > I think it is OK to deprecate the Hive 1.1 support. As of 0.4.6-SNAPSHOT that > I was using the latest build about 3 weeks ago, I did face issues if I did > want to work with Hive 1.1 that is bundled as a part of CDH 5.13 docker > image. I did have to make manual tweaks listed at: > https://github.com/bvaradar/hudi/commit/e189734a07b8782ea1d21b3c780dfc61c2ab8f2b > > (https://link.getmailspring.com/link/[email protected]/0?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fbvaradar%2Fhudi%2Fcommit%2Fe189734a07b8782ea1d21b3c780dfc61c2ab8f2b&recipient=ZGV2QGh1ZGkuYXBhY2hlLm9yZw%3D%3D) > to get it to work. > I thought at Uber CDH is being used. Have you upgraded to CDH6.x? > In summary: My experience has been that without the changes listed above hive > 1.1 has issues. So 0.4.6-SNAPSHOT didnt work for me? I think it will be great > to document that Hive 1.1 support is deprecated and doesnt work beyond 0.4.5? > Thanks > Kabeer. > > On May 17 2019, at 11:18 pm, Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am in favor of deprecating Hive 1.x unless someone has a strong > > objection. Most cloud offerings like EMR/Data Proc all support Hive 2.x and > > Hive 3.x is going to grow. > > This seems like a move in the right direction > > > > /thanks/vinoth > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:55 AM nishith agarwal <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > All, > > > Is anyone using Hudi with Hive 1.x ? Currently, Hudi has a dependency on > > > Hive 1.x and works against Hive 2.x by using specific profiles. > > > There are non-backwards compatible changes in the HiveRecordReader for > > > Hive > > > 1.x vs Hive 2.x. I'm planning to upgrade to Hive 2.x which would > > > essentially mean Hudi's realtime view (HudiRealtimeInputFormat) will NOT > > > work with Hive 1.x anymore (mostly if the schema has nested columns). > > > Also, > > > I'm un-sure if Hive 2.x protocol is backward compatible with Hive 1.x (we > > > depend on forwards compatibility right now for Hudi to work with 2.x and > > > beyond). > > > Let me know what you guys think. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nishith > > > >
