Hi Lamber,

+1 from my side.

Best,
Vino

lamberken <lamber...@163.com> 于2020年1月24日周五 上午7:11写道:

>
>
> Thanks you all. :)
>
>
> Hi @nishith, good catch. I fixed it.
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/1276/files?short_path=55fa8a8#diff-55fa8a81e6bf8c8d9d11d293b41511b5
>
>
> Thanks
> Lamber-Ken
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2020-01-24 04:43:02, "nishith agarwal" <n3.nas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >+1 looks great
> >
> >Nit : I see that the old diagram has "Raw Ingest Tables" vs the new one
> >"Row Ingest Tables". IMO, "Raw Ingest Tables" sounds more logical.
> >
> >-Nishith
> >
> >On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:57 AM Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1. on that :)
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:22 AM hmatu <3480388...@qq.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The whole site looks better than old currently, big thanks for your
> work!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Hmatu
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ------------------ Original ------------------
> >> > From:&nbsp;"Balaji Varadarajan"<v.bal...@ymail.com.INVALID&gt;;
> >> > Date:&nbsp;Fri, Jan 24, 2020 01:21 AM
> >> > To:&nbsp;"dev"<dev@hudi.apache.org&gt;;
> >> >
> >> > Subject:&nbsp;Re: [DISCUSS] Redraw of hudi data lake architecture
> diagram
> >> > on langing page
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >  +1 as well. Looks great.
> >> > Balaji.V
> >> > &nbsp; &nbsp; On Thursday, January 23, 2020, 08:17:47 AM PST, Vinoth
> >> > Chandar <vin...@apache.org&gt; wrote:&nbsp;
> >> > &nbsp;
> >> > &nbsp;Looks good . +1 !
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:44 PM lamberken <lamber...@163.com&gt;
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > &gt;
> >> > &gt;
> >> > &gt; Hello everyone,
> >> > &gt;
> >> > &gt;
> >> > &gt; I redrawed the hudi data lake architecture diagram on landing
> page.
> >> > If you
> >> > &gt; have time, go ahead with hudi website[1] and test site[2].
> >> > &gt; Any thoughts are welcome, thanks very much. :)
> >> > &gt;
> >> > &gt;
> >> > &gt; [1] https://hudi.apache.org
> >> > &gt; [2] https://lamber-ken.github.io
> >> > &gt;
> >> > &gt;
> >> > &gt; Thanks
> >> > &gt; Lamber-Ken
> >> > &nbsp;
> >>
>

Reply via email to