I am not sure the ROI is there for renaming to hudi-deltastreamer  and pull
this out.. Everytime we change a module name, its a breaking change and I
would prefer if we reserved those for really pressing issues.. or take
natural course of development and get there..

Regarding how multi framework support would affect this module, I propose
we leave this module to be spark specific, i.e depending on hudi-spark
alone.. Until, we can make flink work end-end.
This feels kind of premature to me.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:37 AM Gary Li <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1. hudi-delta gives me the feeling that it has something to do with other
> frameworks... I’d vote for another name hudi-deltastreamer or hudi-streamer
> or hudi-stream.
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 2:29 AM vino yang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Currently, it seems the content of hudi-utilities looks a bit mix.
> > Summarize all of them, there are two aspects list below:
> >
> >
> >    - delta streamer and its relevant packages, e.g. deltastreamer,
> sources,
> >    schema, transform, these packages are served for delta streamer.
> >    - Some utility tools such as
> >    HDFSParquetImporter、HiveIncrementalPuller、HoodieCleaner and so on
> >
> >
> > We are trying to refactor the computing engine relevant business logic.
> > Delta Streamer (especially, the sources package is a start point of a job
> > of Spark/Flink) will be affected. Doing this restructure can make the
> work
> > more clear and focus.
> >
> > I would like to start a proposal to restructure the hudi-utilites module.
> > Considering delta streamer is a great feature for hudi, the logic is very
> > much in the hudi-utilites. Can we raise its importance via making the
> delta
> > streamer as a single module? It could be named e.g. hudi-delta or
> something
> > else. Then let the hudi-utilities be a real utilities module to host
> > HDFSParquetImporter、HiveIncrementalPuller、HoodieCleaner tools.
> >
> > In short, we can do these restructure works:
> >
> >
> >    - create a new module, named “hudi-delta” (or other name?) and move
> the
> >    deltastreamer, sources, schema, transform … packages into this module
> >    - leave HDFSParquetImporter、HiveIncrementalPuller、HoodieCleaner … in
> the
> >    current place (utilities module)
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Any comments and suggestions are welcome and appreciated.
> >
> > Best,
> > Vino
> >
>

Reply via email to