+1
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020, 08:35:30 AM PDT, leesf <leesf0...@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1
Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org> 于2020年4月22日周三 下午2:24写道：
> +1 from me as well
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:37 PM vino yang <vinoy...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Raymond,
> >
> > Thanks for opening this discussion.
> >
> > IMHO, as Hudi's user base grows, we need to enhance our metrics reporter.
> > From an ecological point of view, this is also very important.
> >
> > So, +1 from my side.
> >
> > Best,
> > Vino
> >
> > Shiyan Xu <xu.shiyan.raym...@gmail.com> 于2020年4月21日周二 上午10:59写道：
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'd like raise the topic of supporting multiple metrics reporters.
> > >
> > > Currently hudi supports graphite and JMX. And there are 2 proposed
> > reporter
> > > types: CSV and Prometheus
> > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-210
> > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-361
> > >
> > > I think supporting multiple metrics backends gives Hudi competitive
> > > advantage on user expansion. It reduces the friction for different
> > > organizations to adopt Hudi. And we only need to support a few popular
> > ones
> > > to achieve that.
> > >
> > > In terms of determining the list, as mentioned by @vinoyang, flink has
> a
> > > nice list of supported ones:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.10/monitoring/metrics.html#reporter
> > > which can be used as a reference.
> > >
> > > From that list, I'd like to propose supporting Datadog as well, due to
> > its
> > > popularity. May I get +1 on this?
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Raymond
> > >
> >
>
