Thanks Sivabalan

For committers / pmcs, they can use these tools to trigger rebuilid directly,
But for contributors, they can open the url, but the retrigger button will 
hidden.

Best,
Lamber-Ken


On 2020/05/27 13:13:53, Sivabalan <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Not sure if this is a common practice. But can't we trigger via travis-ci
> directly? You can go here
> <https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/hudi/pull_requests> or here
> <https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/hudi/builds> and there you can find an
> option to restart the build (right most column in every row) again if need
> be. Wouldn't this suffice?
> 
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:50 AM vino yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Lamber-Ken,
> >
> > Thanks for opening this discussion.
> >
> > +1 to fix this issue.
> >
> > About the solution, can we consider to introduce a "CI Bot" just like
> > Apache Flink has done?[1]
> >
> > Just a thought.
> >
> > Best,
> > Vino
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/flink-ci/ci-bot/
> >
> > Lamber Ken <[email protected]> 于2020年5月27日周三 下午2:08写道:
> >
> > > Dear community,
> > >
> > > Use case: A build fails due to an externality. The source is actually
> > > correct. It would build OK and pass if simply re-run. Is there some way
> > to
> > > nudge Travis-CI to do another build, other than pushing a "dummy" commit?
> > >
> > > The way I often used is `git commit --allow-empty -m 'trigger rebuild'`,
> > > push a dummy commit, the travis will rebuild. Also noticed some apache
> > > projects have supported this feature.
> > >
> > > For example:
> > > 1. Carbondata use "retest this please"
> > >     https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/3387
> > >
> > > 2. Bookkeeper use "run pr validation"
> > >     https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2158
> > >
> > > But, I can't find a effective solution from Github and Travis's
> > > documentation[1], any thoughts or opinions?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Lamber-Ken
> > >
> > > [1] https://docs.travis-ci.com    https://support.github.com
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> -Sivabalan
> 

Reply via email to