Thanks for the RFC. left comments on the PR.

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:16 PM Balaji Varadarajan <varadar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Hudi Community,
>
> I am proposing this RFC to support pluggable table formats extending beyond
> Hudi's native table format.  This RFC suggests allowing alternatives,
> including NoSQL datastores like DynamoDB for timeline and metadata, and
> other lakehouse table formats to leverage Hudi's higher-level
> functionalities such as the Streamer and automatic table management.
>
> This would reinforce Hudi's position as a comprehensive data lake platform,
> rather than solely a table format, and mitigate the impact of vendor-driven
> comparisons. Furthermore, this approach aligns with database standards that
> support multiple storage backends.
>
> I have also added some non technical motivations in the rfc.
>
> Here is the link to the RFC PR :
> https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/12998
>
> Kindly review and let me know your comments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Balaji.V
>

Reply via email to