Thanks for the RFC. left comments on the PR. On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:16 PM Balaji Varadarajan <varadar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Hudi Community, > > I am proposing this RFC to support pluggable table formats extending beyond > Hudi's native table format. This RFC suggests allowing alternatives, > including NoSQL datastores like DynamoDB for timeline and metadata, and > other lakehouse table formats to leverage Hudi's higher-level > functionalities such as the Streamer and automatic table management. > > This would reinforce Hudi's position as a comprehensive data lake platform, > rather than solely a table format, and mitigate the impact of vendor-driven > comparisons. Furthermore, this approach aligns with database standards that > support multiple storage backends. > > I have also added some non technical motivations in the rfc. > > Here is the link to the RFC PR : > https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/12998 > > Kindly review and let me know your comments. > > Thanks, > > Balaji.V >