Hi. The ticket seems to be stalled now. Do I need to assign it to someone
or poke someone or slack or?

Henrik

On Sat, 28 Dec 2024, 20.31 , <aleksandr.sorokou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Henrik!
>
> > On Dec 28, 2024, at 9:22 AM, Henrik Ingo <hen...@nyrkio.com> wrote:
> >
> > 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PODLINGNAMESEARCH/issues/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-230
> >
> >> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, 22.06 Dave Fisher, <w...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Create a new PODLINGNAMESEARCH issue for Otava. Once that is approved we
> >> can ask INFRA and mentors to make the needed name changes.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>> On Dec 20, 2024, at 9:50 AM, Alexander Sorokoumov <
> >> aleksandr.sorokou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It looks like we have a winner!
> >>>
> >>> What are the next steps, propose the new name in PODLINGNAMESEARCH-228?
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 3:52 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'm fond of Otava too.  Very nice suggestion there.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, at 05:01, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://www.vastavalo.net/tahtikuvio-iso-otava-otava-taivaalla-699408.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, I like Otava too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> henrik
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:50 PM Matt Fleming <m...@nyrkio.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I vote for Otava also.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Matt
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 at 17:47, Alexander Sorokoumov <
> >>>>>> aleksandr.sorokou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I also like Otava with its beautiful lore. It looks to me that it
> is
> >>>> also
> >>>>>>> your preference, Henrik and Sean, right?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 6:27 AM Sean McCarthy <
> >>>>>> sean.mccarthy....@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I quite like Otava, and Tapio is good too. Both have great
> >>>>>> iconography. I
> >>>>>>>> think I have a preference for Otava, given what Henrik said:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It was crucial for... (drumroll) … navigation (whether on the
> >>>> sea or
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> a forest) because its tail points directly to the North Star. Also
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>> stars themselves visually look like change points on a graph
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2024, at 4:37 AM, Henrik Ingo <hen...@nyrkio.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ah right. I guess I like multiple options as potentially good.
> Now
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>> mention it, I thought of the vote more as a poll. It would be
> >>>>>>> interesting
> >>>>>>>>> to see if there's some alternative that kind of "sticks out". But
> >>>>>> maybe
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> facilitate a discussion toward potential consensus, let me
> >>>> aggregate
> >>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>> presented options into a single email at least:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Ghunter
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Tapio
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Sawa
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Mielikki
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Chaser
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Suunnistus
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Otava
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Karen
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> My apologies Mick, when compiling this list I realized your email
> >>>>>>>> actually
> >>>>>>>>> contained a suggestion too. Don't know how I missed it originally
> >>>> as
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> quite clear and a good suggestion.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Eddie and Midnight I'll disqualify due to apparent risk of
> >>>> trademark
> >>>>>>>>> infringement.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> From the above list, I sometimes wonder whether we should ask
> >>>> legal
> >>>>>>>> counsel
> >>>>>>>>> for advice on the following:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Ghunter -> Is it a problem if it rhymes with the
> previously
> >>>>>>>>> disqualified name?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Tapio and Mielikkki -> Is it a problem that they are related to
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> mythical character known as Nyrkiö (my company)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Apache Karen -> Probably offensive?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Actually, Apache Chaser, as it is a synonym of the disqualified
> >>>> name,
> >>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>> be good to check as well.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Even so, from the above list I actually like Apache Otava.
> >>>>>> Personally I
> >>>>>>>>> never felt like I hunt for regressions, nor do I chase them. I
> >>>> simply
> >>>>>>>> find
> >>>>>>>>> them. Otava (Big Bear star constellation) is a perfect symbol for
> >>>>>> that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> henrik
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 2:06 AM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Generally at the ASF we prefer to find consensus rather than
> >>>> voting.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Is there a consensus on Gunther vs. Tapio (or something else)?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>> Dave
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 16, 2024, at 3:54 PM, Henrik Ingo <hen...@nyrkio.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Should we start the voting then?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, 20.17 Alexander Sorokoumov, <
> >>>>>>>>>>> aleksandr.sorokou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I liked Henrik's suggestions, Gunther and Tapio,
> so
> >>>>>>> much,
> >>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>> do
> >>>>>>>>>>>> not want to look any further :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 2:35 PM Mick Semb Wever <
> >>>> m...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 at 02:16, Henrik Ingo <hen...@nyrkio.com
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mick was asking for a name that somehow is associated with
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> topic
> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change detection. I feel like Karen and Suunnistus are
> >>>> perhaps
> >>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>> quite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what you asked for?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not asking for anything.  Was only contributing to ideas
> >>>>>> (open
> >>>>>>>>>> mode).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Up to y'all to land what you want.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to