Maybe I should have described the problem that determined me to write
the patch in the first place. I use iBATIS in a project where I have to
fetch some 4 million rows and process them. Using queryForList is not a
good ideea, since it would load all data in memory when returning the
results. I need to iterate the results, not to have them all at once in
memory.

One dirty trick I applied was to get a java.sql.Connection from
iBATIS's sqlMapClient
(sqlMapClient.openSession().getCurrentConnection()) and solve the
iteration by hand using JDBC code. I don't consider this a solution and
I would need iBATIS to offer such a "queryForIterable" method. If
queryForPaginated list should remain as now, would you agree to the new
(iterable) method to be exposed by SQLMapClient?

Best regards,
Corneliu Rudeanu


--- Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Tying up connections in the PaginatedArrayList would not be a
> desireable functionality to me. I would recommend you write a version
> of PaginatedArrayList for your  own personal use. If you are handling
> large resultsets I would recommend against the use of
> PaginatedArrayList anyways. It is meant for small result scrolling.
> 
> Brandon
> 
> On 9/13/05, Corneliu Rudeanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I made a patch for SQLMapClient which allows reusal of ResultSet's
> > while iterating through a paginated query list. How can I submit
> the
> > patch?
> > 
> > A more detailed description: the current implementation is
> re-running
> > the query when user asks for some page, skipping the results
> > (resultSet.next()) until the requested page is read. This is a
> problem
> > while iterating through large results, and in my opinion that is
> the
> > exact purpose for having paginated queries. My patch keeps the
> > ResultSet cached in the PaginatedList, and invokes next()'s when
> user
> > asks for next page. When a page "from the past" (i.e. going to a
> page
> > with lower index than current - 1) the query runs again, with a
> > behaviour similar to current implementation. Note: the optimization
> > with next+previous pages being cached was kept in my patch.
> > 
> > I have little experience with SVN. Please send some instructions on
> how
> > to submit the patch in order to be evaluated.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Corneliu Rudeanu
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! for Good
> > Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
> > http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
> > 
> >
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to