+1 Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 6, 2019, at 6:56 AM, RD <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:01 PM John Zhuge <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> >>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:59 PM Xabriel Collazo Mojica >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> Xabriel J Collazo Mojica | Senior Software Engineer | Adobe | >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ted Gooch <[email protected]> >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 4:21 PM >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add the python implementation >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:19 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:18 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> >>> >>> I'd like to propose accepting the current Python PR, #54. It has been >>> through a round of reviews and while there is certainly more to do, it is >>> going to be much easier to improve the implementation with smaller pull >>> requests than to keep updating one giant PR. >>> >>> >>> >>> As noted in the discussion thread, this will not be included in the initial >>> Java release. Also, the code would live in the existing repository where we >>> already have visibility, until we have a reason to move it elsewhere. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>> >>> >>> >>> [ ] +1: Commit the current Python PR implementation >>> >>> [ ] +0: . . . >>> >>> [ ] -1: Do not add the current implementation because . . . >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> rb >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Ryan Blue >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Ryan Blue >>> >> >> >> -- >> John Zhuge
