+1 (binding) * checked signature, checksum * Ran unit test, AWS integration test * Tested basic table operations and RewriteDataFiles on AWS EMR Spark 3.0 and 3.1 environments
Best, Jack Ye On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 1:52 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * Checked signature, checksums, ran RAT > * Ran tests > * Tested Spark 3.2 CREATE, INSERT, and INSERT OVERWRITE (same table) > * Tested merge-on-read with v1 table > * Tested update to v2 > * Tested DELETE FROM with merge-on-read > * Tested rewrite_data_files to merge deletes > * Tested adding a partition field and rewriting > * Tested metadata column projection > * Tested custom catalogs > > Everything looks great! > > There was a warning about ANTLR runtime version 4.7.1 instead of 4.8, but > I don't think that's a blocker. > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 12:54 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 non-binding >> >> 1. Verify the signature, checksum >> 2. All tests passed. >> >> Best, >> >> Yufei >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 9:45 AM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/tests. >>> >>> I ran some basic tests using spark 3.2 with the new runtime and >>> everything worked as expected. >>> >>> -Dan >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 5:53 PM Kyle Bendickson <kjbendick...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> Verified signature, checksum, rat check, build and ran tests, and >>>> tested the relevant JAR on both Spark 3.1 and 3.2. >>>> >>>> - Kyle >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:45 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Verified signature >>>>> Verified checksum >>>>> Rat check >>>>> Built and ran test, all succeed, after some temporary local HMS timeout >>>>> Tested relevant jar with Spark 3.2, created various tables and ran >>>>> queries >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Szehon >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:19 PM Russell Spitzer < >>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> All tests passed for me and signatures, checksum and license all were >>>>>> good to go >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:32 PM John Zhuge <jzh...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Checked signature, checksum, and license. >>>>>>> Ran build and test with OpenJDK 1.8.0_312-b07. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ignoring the mr test failures. Maybe my env is not set up correctly? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 19 in TestHiveIcebergStorageHandlerWithEngine >>>>>>> - 3 in TestHiveIcebergStorageHandlerWithMultipleCatalogs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 8:41 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>>>> Iceberg 0.13.0 release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The commit ID is 72237429ba164c054480dcfbdb9fe1c86c04dcda >>>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-0.13.0-rc2 >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-0.13.0-rc2 >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/72237429ba164c054480dcfbdb9fe1c86c04dcda >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-0.13.0-rc2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>>>> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1080/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 0.13.0 >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> John Zhuge >>>>>>> >>>>>> > > -- > Ryan Blue > Tabular >
