Fokko found one issue when using *USE <namespace>* and then *SHOW
VIEWS *(without
specifying a namespace) with the *RESTCatalog*.
While we actually test this in *TestViews *using the *InMemoryCatalog* and
things don't fail and behave as expected, that same behavior fails when
using *RESTCatalog*.
It turns out that the namespace check in the *InMemoryCatalog* is wrong
when dealing with an empty namespace, and so that issue went unnoticed with
the *InMemoryCatalog.*

That being said, we have two bugs
* *SHOW VIEWS* need to use the currently defined namespace when it's
executed without a namespace
* *InMemoryCatalog* needs to correctly deal with empty namespace

I should have PRs ready in a bit but we'll probably do another RC.

Eduard

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 6:32 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <am...@tabular.io> wrote:

> +1 non-binding.
>
> Ran signature, checksum, license checks and build/test with JDK11
> Ran tests with views in Spark3.5/Spark3.4 and Trino with REST/JDBC catalog.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amogh Jahagirdar
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9:10 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Checked license, signature, checksum, build, test with Java17
>> Ran manual test with EMR 7.0 Spark 3.5 and Glue.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jack Ye
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:58 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/test (Java 17)
>>>
>>> I also did manual verification of view features using jdbc catalog
>>> (postgresql).
>>>
>>> -Dan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 6:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Correction, my vote is non-binding
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:07 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > +1 (binding)
>>>> >
>>>> > I checked:
>>>> > - signatures and checksum are OK
>>>> > - ASF license headers
>>>> > - no binary file found in the source distribution
>>>> > - LICENSE/NOTICE are OK (regarding the discussion we had :) )
>>>> > - Build OK with JDK11
>>>> > - Tested JdbcCatalog (with different schema version) with PostgreSQL
>>>> backend
>>>> > - Tested JdbcCatalog with Trino
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks !
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > JB
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:38 AM Drew <img...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > +1 (non-binding)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > - verified signature and checksum
>>>> > > - verified RAT license check
>>>> > > - verified build/tests passing with JDK17
>>>> > > - ran manual tests with GlueCatalog on Spark 3.5
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Drew
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 9:33 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Hi Everyone,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>> Iceberg 1.5.0 release.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> The commit ID is 0c8703078443a3c73a5aa5a6bd1cf904e0b5ce09
>>>> > >> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.5.0-rc3
>>>> > >> *
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.5.0-rc3
>>>> > >> *
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/0c8703078443a3c73a5aa5a6bd1cf904e0b5ce09
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>> > >> *
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.5.0-rc3
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>> > >> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>> repository URL is:
>>>> > >> *
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1153/
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.5.0
>>>> > >> [ ] +0
>>>> > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members
>>>> are encouraged to cast
>>>> > >> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>>>> votes and more binding
>>>> > >> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> - Ajantha
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to