+1 non-binding Verified signatures,checksums,RAT checks, build, and tests with JDK11. I also ran ad-hoc tests for views in Trino with the rest catalog.
Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 5:04 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Normal tarball verification > - Read from my broken view successfully > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 3:07 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/tests (Java 17) >> >> -Dan >> >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 2:10 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> - checked checksum and signature >>> - built from source with jdk11 >>> - tested read and write with Spark 3.5.1 and Glue catalog >>> >>> All looks good >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:49 PM Drew <img...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> - verified signature and checksum >>>> - verified RAT license check >>>> - verified build/tests passing with JDK17 >>>> - ran some manual tests on Spark3.5 with GlueCatalog >>>> >>>> Drew >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 4:38 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> * validated checksum and signature >>>>> * checked license docs & ran RAT checks >>>>> * ran build and tests with JDK11 >>>>> * *verified view support for Nessie catalog with Spark 3.5.* >>>>> * *verified this RC against Trino >>>>> (https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/20957 >>>>> <https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/20957>)* >>>>> >>>>> - Ajantha >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:25 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> - checksums and signatures are OK >>>>>> - ASF headers are present >>>>>> - No unexpected binary files in the source distribution >>>>>> - Build OK with JDK11 >>>>>> - JdbcCatalog tested on Trino and Iceland >>>>>> - No unexpected artifact distributed >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:04 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi Everyone, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>> Iceberg 1.5.0 release. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The commit ID is 2519ab43d654927802cc02e19c917ce90e8e0265 >>>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.5.0-rc6 >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.5.0-rc6 >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/2519ab43d654927802cc02e19c917ce90e8e0265 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.5.0-rc6 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>> > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1161/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.5.0 >>>>>> > [ ] +0 >>>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members >>>>>> are encouraged to cast >>>>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>>> votes and more binding >>>>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > - Ajantha >>>>>> >>>>> > > -- > Ryan Blue > Tabular >
