I think dev list is mostly about developer discussion, such as design, proposal. Github issues are mostly about issue/bug tracking. Github discussion is about user questions, announcements, etc.
But I agree that we could start with iceberg-rust repo first, as it's relatively new and we have more user questions than others may face. On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:24 AM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote: > Thank Renjie to start this thread. > > I considered suggesting enabling GitHub discussions for iceberg-rust, but > I hesitated because Iceberg itself doesn't use this feature and almost all > discussions take place on the mailing list. Although I enjoy using GitHub > discussions, I'm also satisfied with the current setup within the Iceberg > mailing list. > > I will support this idea but want to know how other people think about > this. > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 11:18, Renjie Liu wrote: > > Hi: > > Recently we have observed more and more user interested in iceberg-rust, > and they have many questions about it, for example the status, relationship > with others such pyiceberg. Slack is a great place to discussion, but is > not friendly for long discussion and not easy to comment. We can also > encourage user to use github issue, but it's easy to mix with true issues, > e.g. feature tracking, bug tracking, etc. > > So I propose to enable the discussion tab for repos of iceberg and > subprojects such as iceberg-rust, pyiceberg, iceberg-go. > > Xuanwo > > https://xuanwo.io/ > >
