If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical issues in 1.6+?
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:35 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding), I did not expect this to be a vote thread, but overall +1 > for dropping JDK8 support. > > -Jack > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1(binding), as much as I want to drop JDK 8, still encourage everyone to >> spark out about any concerns. >> Yufei >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:37 AM Piotr Findeisen < >>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding JDK 21 >>>> support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things were initially >>>> related. >>>> A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 support, and >>>> release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline. >>>> There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK 8. >>>> >>>> Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps formal vote >>>> for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release. >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Piotr >>>> >>>>
