Thanks Fokko,

I've just reviewed/merged it. We should be good to do another RC.

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:54 AM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl>
wrote:

> It was not correctly backported, I do think we want to add this since it
> fixes a CVE as mentioned earlier. I've created a PR:
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10988
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
> Op do 22 aug 2024 om 11:35 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> FYI, the reason I mentioned ORC update is because the PR is "flagged"
>> with milestone 1.6.1.
>> So it's a bit surprising to not have it in 1.6.1.
>>
>> We should at least update the PR/issue removing the 1.6.1 milestone,
>> else it would not be "accurate".
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:04 AM Piotr Findeisen
>> <piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Eduard,
>> >
>> > JB wrote
>> >
>> >> For the record (maybe it helps users/reviewers), this release includes:
>> >> - ORC 1.9.4 update
>> >> - introduce memory limit on ParallelIterable
>> >
>> >
>> > I can confirm ParallelIterable change, but i am not sure whether ORC
>> update was part of the release.
>> >
>> >
>> > Best
>> > Piotr
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 09:45, Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey Eduard,
>> >>
>> >> I think it relates to this PR. It contains a CVE and would be good to
>> be backported. We wanted to include it in 1.6.1 if we needed another RC,
>> but that didn't happen, so I think we didn't cherry-pick it to 1.6.x branch.
>> >>
>> >> Kind regards,
>> >> Fokko
>> >>
>> >> Op wo 21 aug 2024 om 09:34 schreef Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>> etudenhoef...@apache.org>:
>> >>>
>> >>> @Piotr can you please elaborate which ORC update you are referring
>> to? Or did you mean the Avro update (which I think we were planning for
>> 1.6.2)?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 7:05 PM Piotr Findeisen <
>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hi
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -1 (non-binding)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I verified source tarball matches the git tag (except it lacks
>> jitpack.yml, docs/ and 'examples/Convert table to Iceberg.ipynb').
>> >>>> However, i noted that source tarball verification is not part of
>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#validating-a-source-release-candidate
>> .
>> >>>> I started a separate dev list thread about this (
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/24c0xhfbb2680nrqyd2jrngxtg6qoz8c).
>> >>>>
>> >>>> as to the changes, it looks like it contains the ParallelIterable
>> change, but I don't see ORC update
>> >>>>
>> >>>> $ git diff apache-iceberg-1.6.0..apache-iceberg-1.6.1-rc1  --numstat
>> >>>> 167     55
>> core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/util/ParallelIterable.java
>> >>>> 48      0
>>  core/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/util/TestParallelIterable.java
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I tested with Trino https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/23083
>> >>>> The parallel change iterable caused a regression in Trino when
>> planning queries with LIMIT.
>> >>>> Now the query scheduler will open more manifests than it used to
>> (test io.trino.plugin.iceberg.TestIcebergFileOperations#testSelectWithLimit
>> in Trino)
>> >>>> Reverting the change around queue low water mark [1][2] solved the
>> test for me locally.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Best,
>> >>>> Piotr
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10978
>> >>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10979
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 15:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1 (non binding)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I checked:
>> >>>>> - download links are OK (both on dist and Maven Staging repo)
>> >>>>> - build passed on the tag using JDK11, including the tests (I'm not
>> >>>>> able to reproduce Renjie's issue)
>> >>>>> - checksum and signature are good
>> >>>>> - ASF header present in expected files
>> >>>>> - no unexpected binary files found in the source distribution
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> For the record (maybe it helps users/reviewers), this release
>> includes:
>> >>>>> - ORC 1.9.4 update
>> >>>>> - introduce memory limit on ParallelIterable
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Regards
>> >>>>> JB
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 4:53 AM Carl Steinbach <c...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Hi Everyone,
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>> Iceberg 1.6.1 release.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > The commit ID is e18a2fe10214f5f3ffa0a317a28af8b2a619817a
>> >>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.6.1-rc1
>> >>>>> > *
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.6.1-rc1
>> >>>>> > *
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/e18a2fe10214f5f3ffa0a317a28af8b2a619817a
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>> >>>>> > *
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.6.1-rc1
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here:
>> >>>>> > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>> repository URL is:
>> >>>>> > *
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1170/
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.6.1
>> >>>>> > [ ] +0
>> >>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members
>> are encouraged to cast
>> >>>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>> votes and more binding
>> >>>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>
>

Reply via email to