+1 I think it would be good to give an overview of the current proposal since it has evolved quite a bit from the original like Jack said.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:09 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for keeping pushing for this Rahil. Personally I am +1 (binding) > for this, with just some minor comments in the latest PR. > > But I think the initial DISCUSS thread [1] was quite a while ago and a lot > has changed after a lot of comments and reviews. Should we restart another > DISCUSS thread before voting, to make sure people are aware of the latest > design and address any additional comments? > > Best, > Jack Ye > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qq13468x6gk0vxnsckzc5xd02tjlvpkm > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 9:22 PM Chertara, Rahil <rcher...@amazon.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I've opened a PR [1] to add REST spec changes for a new protocol around >> table scan planning. For context around the design discussions, see the >> original google doc proposal [2], the dev list discussion thread [3], and >> finally the discussion that has happened on the spec change PR. >> >> >> >> Please vote on merging this change. The vote will remain open for at >> least 72 hours. >> >> >> >> [] +1 >> >> [] +0 >> >> [] -1, do not merge because ... >> >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9695 >> >> [2] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FdjCnFZM1fNtgyb9-v9fU4FwOX4An-pqEwSaJe8RgUg/edit#heading=h.cftjlkb2wh4h >> >> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qq13468x6gk0vxnsckzc5xd02tjlvpkm >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rahil Chertara >> >
