+1 (binding) On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:32 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 2:41 PM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:37 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'd like to vote on PR #10955 >>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10955> that has been open for a >>> while with the changes to add new type promotion cases. After discussion, >>> the PR has been scoped down to keep complexity low. It now adds: >>> >>> * An `unknown` type for cases when only `null` values have been observed >>> * Type promotion from `unknown` to any other type >>> * Type promotion from `date` to `timestamp` or `timestamp_ns` >>> * Clarification that promotion is not allowed if it breaks transform >>> results >>> >>> The set of changes is quite a bit smaller than originally proposed >>> because of the issue already discussed about lower and upper bounds values, >>> and it no longer includes variant. I think that we can add more type >>> promotion cases after we improve bounds metadata. This adds what we can now >>> to keep v3 moving forward. >>> >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>> [ ] -0 >>> [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . . >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ryan >>> >>
