Vote has completed and the Proposal is approved

+1 Votes From

Steven Wu
Yufei Gu
Amogh Jahagirdar
Jack Ye
Daniel Weeks
Eduard Tudenhöfner
Jean-Baptiste Onofré


On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:11 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 2:52 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Yufei
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:47 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1, I've been reviewing this proposal/spec change for a bit and I think
>>> it's in a good state for the community to work on an implementation.
>>>
>>> Thanks Russell for driving this!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:31 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1, overall agree that we should add this!
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jack Ye
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:43 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Russell!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:57 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>>>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I left a few comments on the proposal but I'm overall +1 on the
>>>>>> proposal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did a review on the proposal and it looks good to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:55 PM Russell Spitzer
>>>>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Hi Y'all!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I think we are more or less in agreement on adding Row Lineage to
>>>>>>> the spec apart from a few details which may change a bit during
>>>>>>> implementation. Because of this, I'd like to call for an overall vote on
>>>>>>> whether or not Row-Lineage as described in  PR 11130 can be added to the
>>>>>>> spec.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I'll note this is basically giving a thumbs up for reviewers and
>>>>>>> implementers to go ahead with the pull-request and acknowledging that 
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> support the direction this proposal is going. I do think we'll probably 
>>>>>>> dig
>>>>>>> a few things out when we write the reference implementation, but I 
>>>>>>> think in
>>>>>>> general we have defined the required behaviors we want to see.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes
>>>>>>> > [ ] -0
>>>>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . .
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks everyone,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Russ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to