Looks like we are unanimous now, I can wait another day just in case anyone
has last minute comments and I"ll merge tomorrow.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 3:55 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Sorry to have missed the discussion, but I'm onboard with the proposed
> changes.
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 11:27 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Yufei
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 11:05 AM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks Russell.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:55 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Russell
>>>>
>>>> Op do 23 jan 2025 om 18:47 schreef Aihua Xu <aihu...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> + (non binding).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Russell.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 2:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:51 PM Russell Spitzer
>>>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Hey Y'all
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Yet another Row Lineage Spec update. This adds a MetadataUpdate
>>>>>> EnableRowLineage to the REST Spec. We briefly talked today
>>>>>> > about an alternative EnableFeature(Feature Name) API instead but in
>>>>>> the absence of other features it doesn't seem
>>>>>> > like that's really a requirement now.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I agreed that if we ever do have another feature we want to enable
>>>>>> in a similar way I would take the blame for adding
>>>>>> > this API rather than a generic one.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > That said please take a look
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12050
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Note: We only allow enabling row lineage, it cannot be disabled.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks for your time,
>>>>>> > Russ
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to