+1 (binding) Verified signatures, checksum, RAT checks. Ran build and test with JDK17
Thanks, Amogh Jahagirdar On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:30 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Checked signatures and checksum > - Checked license > - Full Build and Test > > Best regards, > Honah > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:52 AM Russell Spitzer < > russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> Checked Sigs and Checksum >> Ran Rat >> Ran full build/test >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:30 AM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> - Checked signatures and checksum >>> - Checked licenses >>> - Spotchecked NOTICE/LICENSE >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op di 25 feb 2025 om 16:56 schreef Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> I followed "How to Verify a Release" >>>> <https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release>. >>>> Checked out artifact from SVN, >>>> ``` >>>> svn checkout >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1/ >>>> . >>>> ``` >>>> >>>> Verified >>>> * Signature Good >>>> * Checksum Ok >>>> * RAT check passed. 1 unrelated error message >>>> ``` >>>> ERROR: Ignored 0 lines in your exclusion files as comments or empty >>>> lines. >>>> ``` >>>> * Build + test passed, running on Java 17.0.6 (openjdk 17.0.6 >>>> 2023-01-17 LTS) on M1 >>>> * Ran a few examples on Spark >>>> * Ran pyiceberg integration tests, >>>> https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg-python/pull/11 >>>> >>>> I ran the tests both with and without the docker daemon. Without >>>> docker, a few tests failed in `iceberg-aws`, `iceberg-azure`, and >>>> `iceberg-kafka-connect`. There's already an issue to track this at >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12236. >>>> I'm also continuing to see the flakey test for `iceberg-core`'s >>>> `testConcurrentFastAppends` test. I believe this is a local issue with my >>>> machine. >>>> >>>> Thanks for running the release, Eduard! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Kevin Liu >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 4:23 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>> >>>>> - Hash and checksum are good >>>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK in different distributed artifacts (source >>>>> distribution, aws bundle, etc) >>>>> - ASF header present in all expected files >>>>> - No binary file found in the source distribution >>>>> - Did quick smoke tests >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:46 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner >>>>> <etudenhoef...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi Everyone, >>>>> > >>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>> Iceberg 1.8.1 release. >>>>> > >>>>> > The commit ID is 9ce0fcf0af7becf25ad9fc996c3bad2afdcfd33d >>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1 >>>>> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1 >>>>> > * >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/9ce0fcf0af7becf25ad9fc996c3bad2afdcfd33d >>>>> > >>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>> > * >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1 >>>>> > >>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>> > >>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>> repository URL is: >>>>> > * >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1184/ >>>>> > >>>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>>> > >>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>> > >>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 >>>>> > [ ] +0 >>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>> > >>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>>>> encouraged to cast >>>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>> votes and more binding >>>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>
