+1 (binding)
verified signatures/checksums/RAT checks. Ran build/test against JDK17

Thanks,
Amogh Jahagirdar

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 8:57 PM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
> Verified signature, checksum, and license. Tested against JDK 17
> (`17.0.6-zulu`).
> Also ran against pyiceberg's integration tests
> <https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg-python/pull/12>.
>
> Thanks for running the release!
>
> Best,
> Kevin Liu
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 6:30 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Checked signatures/checksums/licenses
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Fokko
>>
>> Op do 13 mrt 2025 om 14:01 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
>> >:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> We fixed the issue with CTAS and refreshing vended credentials in S3.
>>> So I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>> Iceberg 1.7.2 release.
>>>
>>> The commit ID is c4e11060db443b0f3e5b70d25e7784f5a8991ad2
>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc3
>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc3
>>> *
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/c4e11060db443b0f3e5b70d25e7784f5a8991ad2
>>>
>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>> *
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.7.2-rc3
>>>
>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>>
>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository
>>> URL is:
>>> *
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1187/
>>>
>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>
>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.7.2
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>
>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
>>> encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are
>>> 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>

Reply via email to