+1 Yufei
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:42 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op wo 19 mrt 2025 om 18:32 schreef Huang-Hsiang Cheng > <hua...@apple.com.invalid>: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Mar 19, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Brian Hulette <bhule...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> I double-checked why a JSON object was allowed in the first place. It >> looks like the original motivation was to support PROJJSON, but we switched >> to using projjson:<identifier> where <identifier> points to a table >> property. >> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:45 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 2:30 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Makes sense. >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> On 2025/03/19 00:01:00 Szehon Ho wrote: >>>>> > Hi everyone, >>>>> > >>>>> > While working on the reference implementation for Geometry/Geography >>>>> spec, >>>>> > we noticed some parts that can be simplified for this first version: >>>>> > >>>>> > 1. Default values should always be null (requires WKT >>>>> serialization >>>>> > logic, for not many real world use cases) >>>>> > 2. JSON type serialization can be a json string, not a json >>>>> object. >>>>> > >>>>> > I would like to raise a vote for this minor change to the V3 spec to >>>>> the >>>>> > geo types. The PR is: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12533. >>>>> > >>>>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>> > >>>>> > [ ] +1 Add these simplifications to the V3 Geo spec >>>>> > [ ] +0 >>>>> > [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > Szehon >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>
