+1 (binding) 1. checked sigs/checksum/license 2. ran tests using JDK 17
Thanks for running the release! Best regards, Honah On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 8:47 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * checked signatures / checksum > * ran tests using JDK 17 > * ran Spark quickstart examples and a few manual tests > > Thanks for running the release Ajantha. > > Eduard > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 3:22 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> - Checked the signatures, checksum and licenses. >> - Did some checks >> <https://github.com/databricks/docker-spark-iceberg/pull/220/> against >> example notebooks. >> >> Thanks for running this release! >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko >> >> Op wo 23 apr 2025 om 21:41 schreef Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit...@gmail.com>: >> >>> +1 Binding >>> Did the normal tests >>> Rat Check and such >>> Signature Checks out - Eduard's >>> >>> -- I do keep having an issue with some of the S3 Signing tests which >>> require me to keep adjusting my local config inorder for the tests to past. >>> (Requested ports already bound) So that would be nice to clean up if >>> possible. >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non binding) >>>> >>>> I checked: >>>> - Signature and checksum are good >>>> - ASF header present in all expected file in the source distribution >>>> - No binary file found in the source distribution >>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the source distribution >>>> - Build works from the source distribution >>>> - Tested without problem on Flink and Spark with Apache Polaris (with >>>> a couple of changes in Polaris) >>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the aws-bundle jar >>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the azure-bundle jar >>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the gcp-bundle jar >>>> - LICENSE/NOTICE are good in the kafka-connect-runtime distributions >>>> (main and hive) >>>> - Not for later: how do we distribution the kafka-connect-runtime >>>> distributions >>>> >>>> Thanks ! >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:45 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi Everyone, >>>> > >>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>> Iceberg 1.9.0 release. >>>> > >>>> > The commit ID is 7dbafb438ee1e68d0047bebcb587265d7d87d8a1 >>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc2 >>>> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc2 >>>> > * >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/7dbafb438ee1e68d0047bebcb587265d7d87d8a1 >>>> > >>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>> > * >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.0-rc2 >>>> > >>>> > You can find the KEYS file here: >>>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>> > >>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>> repository URL is: >>>> > * >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1190/ >>>> > >>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>> > >>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>> > >>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.0 >>>> > [ ] +0 >>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>> > >>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>>> encouraged to cast >>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>> votes and more binding >>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>> > >>>> > - Ajantha >>>> >>>
