+1 (non-binding) ~ Anurag Mantripragada
> On Apr 30, 2025, at 11:44 AM, Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:34 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng > <hua...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Huang-Hsiang >> >>> On Apr 30, 2025, at 10:06 AM, Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:flyrain...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> Yufei >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:04 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:russell.spit...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:36 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:szehon.apa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Szehon >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:10 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>>>> <etudenhoef...@apache.org <mailto:etudenhoef...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 9:29 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com >>>>>> <mailto:rdb...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I’d like to propose merging PR 12162 >>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12162/files> into the table >>>>>>> spec for v3. The changes are a minimal set of additions needed to >>>>>>> support table encryption schemes, including the scheme that we’re >>>>>>> working on for table encryption with client-managed keys that will be a >>>>>>> separate doc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are two main changes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Add a table of encryption-keys that stores encrypted keys >>>>>>> Add a key-id to snapshot metadata that identifies the key used to >>>>>>> encrypt the snapshot >>>>>>> These are the only changes needed for v3, which we want to keep >>>>>>> separate from the encryption scheme. The table format is responsible >>>>>>> for storing the encrypted key material and the key used for a snapshot. >>>>>>> These changes are compatible with REST catalogs as well as older >>>>>>> catalogs like Hive that manage the metadata JSON location. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please take a look and vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ryan >>>>>>> >>
