+1 (binding)

On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 1:10 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 10:50 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Szehon
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:19 AM Russell Spitzer <
>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 5:32 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 3:45 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 3:27 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for starting a vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's extra context in the PR description. As a summary,
>>>>>> `gz.metadata.json` is the current naming convention for GZIP compressed
>>>>>> metadata.json file and is implemented in both java
>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/97c0e136b8021058897cab7539e3ef89ce5a0341/core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/TableMetadataParser.java#L69-L83>
>>>>>> and python
>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/82e025ee73f04e6174bb1b4d853804d609ca5b67/pyiceberg/serializers.py#L35>.
>>>>>> `metadata.json.gz` is considered the backwards-compatible naming scheme.
>>>>>> We agreed to address expanding the naming convention at a later time.
>>>>>> This PR just documents the current implementations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Kevin Liu
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 11:48 AM Micah Kornfield <
>>>>>> emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote is to merge https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12598
>>>>>>> which documents that GZIP is supported for metadata files and
>>>>>>> implementation details for how gzip files are currently recognized.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Merge the change
>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not merge the change because.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Micah
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Reply via email to