+1 (binding) Checked signature, checksum, and licenses.
Also ran Flink 1.20 with SQL. Thanks Russel for driving the release! On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 2:27 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Verified signature, checksum and license. Thanks Russell for driving this > release! > > Huaxin > > On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 2:03 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Checked signature, checksum, and licenses. >> >> Thanks Russell, for running this release! >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko >> >> Op zo 18 mei 2025 om 01:05 schreef Yuya Ebihara < >> yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com>: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Confirmed that Trino and Starburst CI are green. >>> It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC >>> (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and >>> Snowflake. >>> >>> BR, >>> Yuya >>> >>> On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 2:13 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> - Verified signature, checksum, license. >>>> * Build + test passed using Java 17 on M1 >>>> * Ran a few examples on Spark >>>> * Ran pyiceberg integration tests ( >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/2011) >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Kevin Liu >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 10:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sorry I meant +1 (non binding) >>>>> >>>>> Le sam. 17 mai 2025 à 08:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> a >>>>> écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> +0 (non binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> - Signature and checksum are good >>>>>> - ASF header present in expected file >>>>>> - No binary found in the source distribution >>>>>> - Build is OK >>>>>> - Tested with spark and flink, need some update on Polaris >>>>>> - The aws-bundle, azure-bundle, gcp-bundle, kafka-connect-runtime >>>>>> LICENSE should include content for MIT and BSD (inline or dedicated >>>>>> folder), also, in case of dual license, we should "exclusively" select >>>>>> one. I gonna fix that, as it's like this for a while (I missed that >>>>>> before), it can be fixed in next release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 11:32 PM Russell Spitzer >>>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi Y'all, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>> Iceberg 1.9.1 release. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The commit ID is 5541cf000084b9e139d8dd22db44db7f592c3a2d >>>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc0 >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc0 >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/5541cf000084b9e139d8dd22db44db7f592c3a2d >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc0 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1201/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 >>>>>> > [ ] +0 >>>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members >>>>>> are encouraged to cast >>>>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>>> votes and more binding >>>>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>
