+1 (non binding) I checked: * source distribution ** checksum and signature are good ** LICENSE and NOTICE look good ** No binary file found in the source distribution ** Header looks good in files ** Build works from the source distribution ** Tested with Spark and Polaris * in the bundled jar files: ** aws-bundle jar contains correct LICENSE/NOTICE ** azure-bundle jar contains LICENSE/NOTICE, nit: Azure MIT license content should be part of the LICENSE (inline). I will fix that. ** gcp-bundle jar contains LICENSE/NOTICE, nit: Google BSD 3-Clause license content should be part of the LICENSE (inline), and some dependencies have dual licenses, only one should be "selected" in Iceberg (exclusive). I will fix that. ** kafka-runtime (main and hive) contains LICENSE/NOTICE, nit: same issue as in azure-bundle and gcp-bundle about exclusive license and MIT/BSD license content
Regards JB On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 1:19 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Y'all, > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Iceberg > 1.9.1 release. > > The commit ID is f40208ae6fb2f33e578c2637d3dea1db18739f31 > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc1 > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc1 > * > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/f40208ae6fb2f33e578c2637d3dea1db18739f31 > > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.9.1-rc1 > > You can find the KEYS file here: > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS > > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository URL is: > * https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1202/ > > Please download, verify, and test. > > Please vote in the next 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.9.1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... > > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are > encouraged to cast > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes and > more binding > +1 votes than -1 votes. > > --- > > For those watching the big change between this and RC0 was the reversion of > code which > caused the rest client to emit multiple Snapshot Removals Requests in the > same MetadataUpdate. > This restores the behavior to that of 1.8.X, 1 removal per update. > We plan to move to the new behavior in a later release
