Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for [REST SPEC] Add row
lineage fields

The vote result is:

+1: 5 (binding), 2 (non-binding).  {Steven, Eduard, Peter, Yufei, Daniel}
| {JB, Huaxin}
+0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)
-1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)

Therefore, the vote is passed. Would request to get the following PR
<https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13010/files> merged !

Best,
Prashant Singh

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 9:34 AM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 9:49 AM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 9:20 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> Yufei
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 9:18 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> Le ven. 23 mai 2025 à 00:38, Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to include the Row lineage
>>>>> fields. As these need to be passed from server to client for reads,
>>>>> as it is inferred during planning during server side via inheritance from
>>>>> Manifest and manifest list and not something client can infer on its own
>>>>> without them.
>>>>> *PR*:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13010/files
>>>>> *Discuss Thread* :
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/p51pc0g4l7mvr1x0xrn4gsf7gfnq0cnq
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Prashant
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to