Hi I think Christian updated the spec with the latest discussion (especially about actor object). I would suggest making a new review and maybe sync-up during the next Catalog Community meeting.
Regards JB On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 1:18 AM Adnan Hemani <adnan.hem...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Wanted to see if there were any remaining action items or discussions > remaining on this topic. I’m trying to get a gauge of how close we might be > on getting this merged! > > Best, > Adnan Hemani > > On 2025/05/28 17:33:20 Christian Thiel wrote: > > Thank you all for the great discussion today! > > I have updated the proposal. Key changes are: > > > > - > > > > Specify that clients should ignore unknown operation & event types > > - > > > > Specify the `actor` field as part of the `Event` schema as an opaque > > string. Remove the `Actor` type. > > - Remove the `actors` filter from the `GetEventsRequest`, add an > > extendable `custom-filters` object instead (`additionalProperties: true`) > > > > The diff for the changes since the sync today is available in Github: > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12584/commits/3de9a7c5d128b1100c38ce688603c94491008d35 > > The google doc is also updated, > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WtIsNGVX75-_MsQIOJhXLAWg6IbplV4-DkLllQEiFT8/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Looking forward to more feedback, especially regarding custom operations! > > > > On Tue, 27 May 2025 at 10:15, Christian Thiel <ch...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I think we have reached mostly consensus here. > > > There is one more change since our last discussion: We removed the > > > recursive "assumed-by" field of actors in favor or an "actor-chain" list. > > > > > > If there is any more need for discussion please voice it here on the > > > Mailing List or in the Catalog sync tomorrow. I would otherwise start a > > > vote. > > > > > > Best, > > > Christian > > > > > > On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 11:18, Christian Thiel <ch...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Dear all, > > >> > > >> I worked the changes discussed in the last catalog sync into the Events > > >> proposal [1]. > > >> Those include: > > >> - Using request-id instead of transaction > > >> - A more flexible User (now called Actor) > > >> - Custom Operation type > > >> > > >> The specific diff compared to the last discussion can be best seen in my > > >> latest commit in git [2]. > > >> It would be good to still comment in Google Docs so that we have > > >> everything in one place. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Christian > > >> > > >> [1]: > > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WtIsNGVX75-_MsQIOJhXLAWg6IbplV4-DkLllQEiFT8/edit?usp=sharing > > >> [2]: > > >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12584/commits/4d67051e03d5345687566b3900db3af23ce15766 > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 14:53, Christian Thiel <ch...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Dear all, > > >>> after the last Catalog sync I updated the proposal. > > >>> Changes are in the original proposal Document [1] and the original PR > > >>> [2] > > >>> > > >>> Best, > > >>> Christian > > >>> > > >>> [1] > > >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WtIsNGVX75-_MsQIOJhXLAWg6IbplV4-DkLllQEiFT8/edit?usp=sharing > > >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12584 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 10:49, Christian Thiel < > > >>> christian.t.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Dear all, > > >>>> > > >>>> We have recently discussed in the Iceberg Catalog Community Sync [1] > > >>>> and the Mailing List [2] different ways on how federation between > > >>>> Catalogs > > >>>> could be standardized. > > >>>> > > >>>> This proposal introduces a /events endpoint to the IRC specification. > > >>>> The endpoint provides events of modifications to objects managed by the > > >>>> Catalog (tables, namespaces, views), allowing consumers to efficiently > > >>>> track metadata changes using persistent offsets for reliable > > >>>> consumption > > >>>> and resumability. > > >>>> > > >>>> Proposal Document: > > >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WtIsNGVX75-_MsQIOJhXLAWg6IbplV4-DkLllQEiFT8/edit?usp=sharing > > >>>> > > >>>> I am looking forward to your thoughts and hope we find time in next > > >>>> week's Catalog sync to discuss this further. > > >>>> > > >>>> Best > > >>>> Christian > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] Catalog Community Sync Feb. 2025 > > >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYcehreE8Nk > > >>>> [2] Mailing List, September 2024 - Notifications Endpoint: > > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/zcv6qm9ysknrhfpg093qgnrkrolptcht > > >>>> > > >>> > >
