+1 (Binding)
   Verified sigs/checksums
   Verified Rat
    Ran full Build and test
  Bothered Aihua to run the internal SF suite :)


On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 4:33 PM Drew <img...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
>
>    - verified signature and checksums
>    - verified RAT license check
>    - verified build/tests passing
>    - ran some manual tests with GlueCatalog
>
> - Drew
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 7:54 AM Jacky Lee <qcsd2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Built and tested Spark 4.0.1 and Flink 2.0 on JDK17, including unit
>> tests, basic insert/read operations, and metadata validation.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jacky Lee
>>
>> Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> 于2025年9月8日周一 16:23写道:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Ran following check and tests:
>> > 1. Verified checksum
>> > 2. Verified signature
>> > 3. Ran dev/check-license
>> > 4. Ran `gradlew build`
>> >
>> > All passed.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 10:36 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> Verified signature, checksum, license
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ran build successfully (except for a couple of Spark extension tests
>> due to my env)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ran Spark 4.0 SQL with V3 format and Java 21
>> >>
>> >> - Insert
>> >> - Update carries over row id and sets snapshot seq num correctly
>> >> - Select with _row_id and _last_updated_sequence_number
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Run Flink 2.0 SQL testing with V2 format and Java 21
>> >> - Insert
>> >> - Streaming read
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Steven
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 10:19 PM Yuya Ebihara <
>> yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >>>
>> >>> Confirmed that Trino CI is green in Trino PR #25795.
>> >>> It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC
>> (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and
>> Snowflake.
>> >>>
>> >>> Yuya
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 1:38 PM Aihua Xu <aihu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have verified the signature and checksum, completed the build and
>> unit tests, and ran basic Spark table creation and queries.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I also executed the tests against our Snowflake internal test suite.
>> One test failure was observed, related to snapshot expiry, caused by
>> Iceberg PR #13614 — “Fix incorrect selection of incremental cleanup in
>> expire snapshots.” I believe our test should be updated to reflect the
>> behavior introduced by this fix.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1 (non-binding).
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 11:50 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>> Iceberg 1.10.0 release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The commit ID is 2114bf631e49af532d66e2ce148ee49dd1dd1f1f
>> >>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.0-rc5
>> >>>>> *
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.0-rc5
>> >>>>> *
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/2114bf631e49af532d66e2ce148ee49dd1dd1f1f
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>> >>>>> *
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.0-rc5
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
>> >>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>> repository URL is:
>> >>>>> *
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1269/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
>> >>>>> *
>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.0
>> >>>>> [ ] +0
>> >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members
>> are encouraged to cast
>> >>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>> votes and more binding
>> >>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>
>

Reply via email to