+1 Thanks Szehon
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:54 PM Scott Haines <shaines@buf.build.invalid> wrote: > +1. > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:32 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:28 PM Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Best, >>> Prashant Singh >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 6:58 PM Steve <hongyue.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 non-binding >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 20:16 Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 8:14 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1(binding). LGTM, esp. given that the standard positional deletes >>>>>> with (filename, row-position) will continue to exist. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yufei >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yuya Ebihara < >>>>>> yuya.ebih...@starburstdata.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 6:06 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1, thanks Peter >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 2:08 PM Wing Yew Poon >>>>>>>> <wyp...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 12:48 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 to removing this from the Java implementation and API. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:08 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:30 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>>>>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:58 AM Péter Váry < >>>>>>>>>>>> peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Position Deletes With Row (PDWR) feature, originally >>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced in the Iceberg V2 specification, has been deprecated >>>>>>>>>>>>> in V3. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion in the previous thread [1], we >>>>>>>>>>>>> propose deprecating PDWR in the Java implementation starting with >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.11.0 release. We plan to remove PDWR support entirely >>>>>>>>>>>>> from the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Java implementation beginning with Iceberg 1.12.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> While PDWR will remain part of the V2 spec, the Java >>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation will no longer write PDWR delete files. It will >>>>>>>>>>>>> only support >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading the position and file name columns from previously >>>>>>>>>>>>> created delete >>>>>>>>>>>>> files or those generated by other engines. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For reference, the proposed changes are available here [2]. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8jw6pb2vq3ghmdqf1yvy8n5n6gg1fq5s >>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14045 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
