Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for rest spec `Add idempotency
key for mutating endpoints of Plan API`
The vote result is:
+1: 5 (binding), 4 (non-binding). {Steven, Yufei, Szehon, Eduard, Peter}
| {Steve, JB, Chirstian, Aihua}
+0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)
-1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding)
Therefore, the vote is passed. will merge the spec change PR !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 7:44 AM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2025, at 7:20 AM, Christian Thiel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 at 11:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 7:50 PM Prashant Singh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> As we discussed before in the idempotency spec, having an idempotency
>>> key in a mutating endpoint is really beneficial incase of clients HTTP
>>> retries per [1] (Thank you Huaxin for driving it)
>>>
>>> I want to propose adding idempotency keys to plan endpoint too, since
>>> some of them are mutating endpoints having idempotency key for them would
>>> be helpful for the server to make the call incase the client retries the
>>> same request, as the course of that i have created a spec PR [2] for the
>>> same.
>>>
>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Prashant
>>>
>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ppjdo97l4qpcxn0h0j6zhykgs7d0fpf7
>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.apache.org/thread/ppjdo97l4qpcxn0h0j6zhykgs7d0fpf7&source=gmail-imap&ust=1765466426000000&usg=AOvVaw0cII3YyskBa-Lomqwqb6jf>
>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14730
>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14730&source=gmail-imap&ust=1765466426000000&usg=AOvVaw0eITnn55G1CId-yBLtAvQC>
>>>
>>
