+1 (non binding)

I checked:
- source distribution
-- signature and checksum are good
-- LICENSE and NOTICE are good (NB: the site includes termynal.css under
MIT license; it should be mentioned in the LICENSE with MIT license content
inline. I will propose a PR to fix that).
-- No binary/compiled file found in the source distribution
-- Some files don't have ASF header (in site html/css, not a blocker but
good to be fixed, I will create a PR).
- binary artifacts (aws-bundle, azure-bundle, gcp-bundle,
kafka-connect-runtime, spark-runtime, flink-runtime) LICENSE and NOTICE are
good

Regards
JB

On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 8:47 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a restarted vote for Apache Iceberg 1.10.1 RC0. The previous vote
> was
>
> cancelled because the Nexus staging repositories referenced there were
>
> incomplete. The source release (tag apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc0, commit
>
> 75b7f60f103b86b295fe4f108c8487896e439dd3 and tarball on dist.apache.org)
> is
>
> unchanged; only the Nexus staging repository URL has been corrected.
>
> The commit ID is 75b7f60f103b86b295fe4f108c8487896e439dd3
>
> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc0
>
> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc0
>
> *
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/75b7f60f103b86b295fe4f108c8487896e439dd3
>
> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>
> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc0
>
> You can find the KEYS file here:
>
> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>
> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository URL
> is:
>
> *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1272/
>
> Please download, verify, and test.
>
> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
>
> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release
>
> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.1
>
> [ ] +0
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>
> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
> encouraged to cast
>
> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes and
> more binding
>
> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Huaxin
>
>

Reply via email to