+1

Apache Arrow is doing the same thing for a long time:
https://arrow.apache.org/blog/

Dipankar Mazumdar <[email protected]> 于2026年1月8日周四 18:30写道:

> +1 to having a project-level blog.
>
> Best,
> Dipankar
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 3:42 PM Renjie Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 3:44 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 12:27 AM Matt Topol <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2026, 2:55 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>> Yufei
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 11:39 AM Neelesh Salian <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to this. We spoke about this during the Python sync this morning
>>>>>> too.
>>>>>> I like the format for Arrow: https://arrow.apache.org/blog. It's a
>>>>>> bit similar to Datafusion but feels more connected to the Arrow project
>>>>>> overall.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 11:19 AM Russell Spitzer <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm +1 and I think we should stick to project updates and features.
>>>>>>> Release notes, events, design walkthroughs etc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 10:18 AM Tushar Choudhary <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think this is a great idea too. +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Tushar Choudhary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 I had a similar idea a while back:
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/txhw1f27pj7444t8o8jf5qoyqk2zhjxf /
>>>>>>>>> "[Discuss] Iceberg Blog Posts".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For example, Swapna Marru just published this Iceberg-related post
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> the Flink blog:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://flink.apache.org/2025/11/11/from-stream-to-lakehouse-kafka-ingestion-with-the-flink-dynamic-iceberg-sink/
>>>>>>>>> It would be great to see similar posts on the Iceberg blog. Even
>>>>>>>>> if we
>>>>>>>>> just put the release notes, I think that would already provide a
>>>>>>>>> lot
>>>>>>>>> more visibility for Iceberg.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Obviously, the posts should reflect the Iceberg community, i.e.
>>>>>>>>> revolve about Iceberg internals, using Iceberg, and not be
>>>>>>>>> affiliated
>>>>>>>>> with companies. Basically, the same rules apply to blog posts as to
>>>>>>>>> the rest of the code base.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 8:03 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Hey folks,
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > I want to gauge the interest of starting a project-level blog at
>>>>>>>>> iceberg.apache.org/blogs/, drawing inspiration from the Apache
>>>>>>>>> Datafusion blog (datafusion.apache.org/blog/)
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > The blog would focus on project-level news and updates. I
>>>>>>>>> believe starting a project blog would be beneficial to the community.
>>>>>>>>> > There are many great features in-development that would benefit
>>>>>>>>> from the wider visibility that the blog will provide. Thinking back 
>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>> V3 ratification announcement, as an Iceberg community member, I would 
>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>> to see the announcement come from the project instead of summarized by
>>>>>>>>> various other blogs. Release notes would also be helpful to put into 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> blog.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > I know there were previous concerns around the logistics; what
>>>>>>>>> content belongs on the blog, who should write the blog, and how 
>>>>>>>>> should the
>>>>>>>>> community/committer/PMC review the content. I'm happy to work with the
>>>>>>>>> community to provide general guidance.
>>>>>>>>> > I strongly believe the blog would have an outsize benefit to the
>>>>>>>>> community.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Would love to hear thoughts here.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Best,
>>>>>>>>> > Kevin Liu
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Neelesh S. Salian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to