+1 On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 2:33 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 7:22 AM Péter Váry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026, 06:04 Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> +1, sorry it got lost in my inbox > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 4:48 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 binding > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 8:19 PM roryqi <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>> > >>>> huaxin gao <[email protected]> 于2026年2月5日周四 11:02写道： > >>>> > > >>>> > +1 (non-binding) > >>>> > > >>>> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 5:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> +1 (binding); I approved the PR a long time ago, but forgot to > vote. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Yufei > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2026 at 10:01 AM Prashant Singh < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Hey Everyone, > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> I hope you all are having a great start to the new year! > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Now since the server side scan planning can vend cred [1], I want > to propose adding the X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation header in the spec for > these endpoints send by client to server, to have consistency from other > endpoints that vends creds and to only mint the creds via this endpoint > only when the client wants. > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Please ref: > >>>> >>> Discuss thread : > https://lists.apache.org/thread/w45r0rrlzyn8v1gzkkqzry8tkbfd0w86 > >>>> >>> Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14781 > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Looking forward to your thoughts and feedback. > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/vq6nzsc0vs81r8dhr94dp222s0gq1ykw > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Thanks, > >>>> >>> Prashant Singh >
