+1

Prashant Singh <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. febr.
5., Cs, 16:47):

> +1 (nb)
>
> Best,
> Prashant Singh
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 6:26 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 1:03 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 10:59 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 1:12 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 8:03 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With the discussions from the earlier threads largely wrapped up, I
>>>>>> would like to raise a vote to adopt the SQL UDF specification.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *What is included?*
>>>>>> The SQL UDF spec defines a common way to describe and manage user
>>>>>> defined functions across catalogs and engines. It covers how functions 
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> identified, their parameters and types, and basic metadata for versioning
>>>>>> and compatibility.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *What does adopting this spec mean?*
>>>>>> Adopting this spec means the community agrees on the current design
>>>>>> and will keep it compatible going forward. It doesn’t require immediate
>>>>>> implementation or enabling UDFs by default, but sets a stable foundation
>>>>>> for future work. Any breaking changes later would follow the normal spec
>>>>>> evolution process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many thanks to everyone who contributed feedback, reviews, and design
>>>>>> discussions to help shape this spec. The amount of iteration and cross
>>>>>> project input has been invaluable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Related links:
>>>>>> 1. Dev mailing discussion:
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/flcmx3xgqp7mccqt66vcpmdy11rk5pbo
>>>>>> 2. PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14117.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote within the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Adopt the SQL UDF specification
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not adopt at this time, with reason
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yufei
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> John Zhuge
>>>
>>

Reply via email to