+1, thanks Alex On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 9:27 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 5:33 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We recently agreed [1] on promoting the remote signing endpoint to the >> main REST spec. Now that the corresponding PR [2] is approved, I would >> like to start a formal vote to adopt the REST spec changes. >> >> Summary of spec-related changes in the PR: >> >> - The remote signing endpoint has been moved to the main REST spec >> under the table path: >> /v1/{prefix}/namespaces/{namespace}/tables/{table}/sign. >> >> - The remote signing endpoint now accepts an optional "provider" >> parameter in the request body for future storage provider >> disambiguation. It defaults to "s3" for backwards compatibility. >> >> - The old, S3-specific remote signing spec is deprecated for removal. >> >> Many thanks to everyone who contributed with feedback and reviews. >> >> Related links: >> >> [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/2kqdqb46j7jww36wwg4txv6pl2hqq9w7 >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15112 >> >> Please vote within the next 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Adopt the promotion of the remote signing endpoint to the main >> REST spec >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 Do not adopt, please explain why >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >
