Hi Shawn, Thanks for working on this release.
+1 binding - Verified checksums and signatures - Built from source and successfully ran tests - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE - No unexpected binaries were found - Verified the download links are correct. Just noting that I observed a similar flakiness with the test Kurtis mentioned, though I do not consider it a blocker for this release. Sung On 2026/05/06 07:56:14 Maximilian Michels wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > 1. Verified the archive checksum and signature > 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries > 3. Verified license files / headers > > -Max > > PS: Still one more binding vote needed! > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 7:18 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Bump, this needs 1 more binding vote :) > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 4:28 PM Kurtis Wright <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Verified on two machines: > >> > >> AL2 x86_64 > >> AL2 aarch64 > >> > >> > >> Checks performed on both: > >> > >> Signature: `gpg --verify` OK against KEYS from > >> https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS > >> Checksum: sha512 OK > >> LICENSE and NOTICE present at the tarball root > >> Binary files found include Avro manifest-list fixtures and Puffin `.bin` > >> fixtures under `crates/iceberg/testdata/`. Non-blocking nit: > >> `.idea/vcs.xml` is included in the tarball. Will create an issue and send > >> PR to remove IDE files if this wasn't intentional. > >> License headers: `license-eye header check` found 0 invalid > >> ran via `go install > >> github.com/apache/skywalking-eyes/cmd/license-eye@latest` received > >> following error: apache/skywalking-eyes:latest` container image fails with > >> `exec format error` on linux/arm64 — appears amd64-only > >> Built from source: `make build` passed on both (1 flaky test see note > >> below) > >> Unit + doc tests: `make unit-test` passed on both > >> > >> One test showed flakiness during `make unit-test`: > >> `catalog::memory::catalog::tests::test_update_table` failed once with > >> assertion failed: table.metadata().last_updated_ms() < > >> updated_table.metadata().last_updated_ms() > >> at crates/iceberg/src/catalog/memory/catalog.rs:1880 > >> I have cut the following minor changes to fix it: > >> > >> PR - https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/2395 > >> Issue - https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/2393 > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 9:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (non binding) > >>> > >>> See my comment about binary files present in the source distribution. > >>> > >>> I verified: > >>> - signature and checksum are good > >>> - LICENSE and NOTICE are correct > >>> - ASF header is present in all expected files > >>> - There are three compiled binary test data files present in the source > >>> distribution (empty-puffin-uncompressed.bin, > >>> sample-metric-data-compressed-zstd.bin, > >>> sample-metric-data-uncompressed.bin). Source distribution must not > >>> contain any binary/compiled file. It would be great to download these > >>> files at build time instead of being part of the source distribution. > >>> Worth to consider in future release. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:28 PM Shawn Chang <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hello Apache Iceberg Rust Community, > >>>> > >>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg Rust version 0.9.1. > >>>> > >>>> The tag to be voted on is: v0.9.1-rc.3 > >>>> > >>>> The release candidate artifacts are available at: > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.9.1-rc3/ > >>>> > >>>> The KEYS file for verifying signatures is available at: > >>>> https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS > >>>> > >>>> The Git tag for this release is: > >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/v0.9.1-rc.3 > >>>> > >>>> Please download, verify, and test the release candidate. > >>>> > >>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will remain open until > >>>> the required number of votes is reached. > >>>> > >>>> Please vote accordingly: > >>>> [ ] +1 Approve > >>>> [ ] +0 No opinion > >>>> [ ] -1 Disapprove (please provide a reason) > >>>> > >>>> To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please visit: > >>>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/ > >>>> > >>>> Checklist for reference: > >>>> [ ] Download links are valid > >>>> [ ] Checksums and signatures are correct > >>>> [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are present > >>>> [ ] No unexpected binary files are included > >>>> [ ] All source files have ASF headers > >>>> [ ] The project builds successfully from source > >>>> > >>>> For more details, please refer to: > >>>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Shawn > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thank You and Cheers, > >> Kurtis C. Wright >
